Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and BiologicsAgilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics
VS
FortreaFortrea
Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics

Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics

5301 Stevens Creek Blvd, Santa Clara , 95051, US

Last Update: 25/12/2025

View Profile
756/1000Fair

Discovering and developing both small molecule pharmaceuticals and biopharmaceuticals is a costly and difficult process. At every stage, from research to quality control and manufacturing, Agilent can help you make the right choices. Agilent understands your workflows ...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Fortrea

Fortrea

Research Triangle Park, NC, US

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://fortrea.com
776/1000Fair

Fortrea (Nasdaq: FTRE) is a leading global clinical research organization (CRO) dedicated to providing innovative clinical development solutions to the life sciences industry. With over 30 years of clinical research experience, Fortrea has evolved from Covance and Labco...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:11,293
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics

Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Fortrea

Fortrea

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fortrea in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Fortrea (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fortrea cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics

Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Fortrea

Fortrea

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics company and Fortrea company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics company and Fortrea company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics company and Fortrea company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics company and Fortrea company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics company and Fortrea company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics company and Fortrea company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics company and Fortrea company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics company and Fortrea company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics company and Fortrea company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics company and Fortrea company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics company and Fortrea company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics and Fortrea, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics and Fortrea, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics or Fortrea ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics or Fortrea ?
Between Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics and Fortrea, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Agilent Pharma - Small Molecule and Biologics and Fortrea, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3