Comparison Overview
B12 Admark · Konecta ·

B12 Admark · Konecta ·
Calle de Serrano, 41, Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, 28001, ES
Last Update: 21/04/2026
Somos una empresa de tecnología enfocada a perfeccionar y mejorar los canales de venta de los negocios con los que trabajamos. Inteligencia Artificial y Big Data se unen a más de 30 años de experiencia comercial en un proyecto multinacional desarrollado entre España, Co...

Quad
Sussex, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Quad (NYSE: QUAD) is a global marketing experience company that helps brands make direct consumer connections, from household to in-store to online. Supported by state-of-the-art technology and data-driven intelligence, Quad uses its suite of media, creative and product...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

B12 Admark · Konecta ·







Quad






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for B12 Admark · Konecta · in 2026.
Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Quad in 2026.
Incident History - B12 Admark · Konecta · (X = Date, Y = Severity)
B12 Admark · Konecta · cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Quad (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Quad cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

B12 Admark · Konecta ·

Quad
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.