Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AGC Plasma Technology SolutionsAGC Plasma Technology Solutions
VS
Atlas Copco GroupAtlas Copco Group
AGC Plasma Technology Solutions

AGC Plasma Technology Solutions

Avenue Jean Monnet 4, Louvain-la-Neuve, 1348, BE

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.agc-plasma.com/
746/1000Moderate

AGC is a global materials supplier and has a worldwide industrial manufacturing network of coating plants which coats over 500 million square feet of glass sheets every year. With AGC Plasma Technology Solutions, AGC brings nanocoating expertise to a broad range of indu...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Atlas Copco Group

Atlas Copco Group

Sickla Industriväg 19, Stockholm, 10523, SE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
781/1000Fair

Atlas Copco Group enables technology that transforms the future. We innovate to develop products, services and solutions that are key to our customers’ success. Our four business areas offer compressed air and vacuum solutions, energy solutions, dewatering and industria...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:48,857
Subsidiaries:57
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AGC Plasma Technology Solutions

AGC Plasma Technology Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Atlas Copco Group

Atlas Copco Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AGC Plasma Technology Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlas Copco Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AGC Plasma Technology Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AGC Plasma Technology Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Atlas Copco Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlas Copco Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AGC Plasma Technology Solutions

AGC Plasma Technology Solutions

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Atlas Copco Group

Atlas Copco Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between AGC Plasma Technology Solutions company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AGC Plasma Technology Solutions company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AGC Plasma Technology Solutions company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AGC Plasma Technology Solutions company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AGC Plasma Technology Solutions company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AGC Plasma Technology Solutions company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AGC Plasma Technology Solutions company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AGC Plasma Technology Solutions company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AGC Plasma Technology Solutions company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AGC Plasma Technology Solutions company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AGC Plasma Technology Solutions company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AGC Plasma Technology Solutions and Atlas Copco Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AGC Plasma Technology Solutions and Atlas Copco Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AGC Plasma Technology Solutions or Atlas Copco Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AGC Plasma Technology Solutions or Atlas Copco Group ?
Between AGC Plasma Technology Solutions and Atlas Copco Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AGC Plasma Technology Solutions and Atlas Copco Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1