Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AGC Pharma ChemicalsAGC Pharma Chemicals
VS
Novo NordiskNovo Nordisk
AGC Pharma Chemicals

AGC Pharma Chemicals

Camí de la Pomereda, 13, Malgrat de Mar, 08380, ES

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

AGC Pharma Chemicals, with operations in Spain and Japan, is a reliable CDMO (Contract Development Manufacturing Organization) serving the global pharmaceutical industry with small molecule APIs and intermediates. We excel in delivering top pharma quality operations. Wi...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:190
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Novo Nordisk

Novo Nordisk

Novo Alle, Bagsværd, 2880, DK

Last Update: 13/07/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.novonordisk.com
674/1000Weak

We’re not your typical healthcare company. In a modern world of quick fixes, we focus on solutions to defeat serious chronic disease and create long-term health. We seek out new ideas and put people first as we push the boundaries of science, make healthcare more acces...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:62,361
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AGC Pharma Chemicals

AGC Pharma Chemicals

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Novo Nordisk

Novo Nordisk

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AGC Pharma Chemicals in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Novo Nordisk has 188.46% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - AGC Pharma Chemicals (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AGC Pharma Chemicals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Novo Nordisk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Novo Nordisk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AGC Pharma Chemicals

AGC Pharma Chemicals

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Novo Nordisk

Novo Nordisk

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
NOV1781951217
🔒 Incident : Breach
NOV1781195765
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ORA1780418023

FAQ

Between AGC Pharma Chemicals company and Novo Nordisk company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AGC Pharma Chemicals company and Novo Nordisk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AGC Pharma Chemicals company and Novo Nordisk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AGC Pharma Chemicals company and Novo Nordisk company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AGC Pharma Chemicals company and Novo Nordisk company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AGC Pharma Chemicals company and Novo Nordisk company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AGC Pharma Chemicals company and Novo Nordisk company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AGC Pharma Chemicals company and Novo Nordisk company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AGC Pharma Chemicals company and Novo Nordisk company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AGC Pharma Chemicals company and Novo Nordisk company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AGC Pharma Chemicals company and Novo Nordisk company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AGC Pharma Chemicals and Novo Nordisk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AGC Pharma Chemicals and Novo Nordisk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AGC Pharma Chemicals or Novo Nordisk ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AGC Pharma Chemicals or Novo Nordisk ?
Between AGC Pharma Chemicals and Novo Nordisk, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AGC Pharma Chemicals and Novo Nordisk, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1