Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AfterpayAfterpay
VS
Commonwealth BankCommonwealth Bank
Afterpay

Afterpay

376-390 Collins St, Melbourne, 3000, AU

Last Update: 20/03/2026

View Profile
761/1000Fair

We started a movement in which everyone can win – shoppers, retailers, society and every person on our team. To play fair, trust people and reward them for doing the right thing. We see and feel the impact of our work as more and more people gain financial freedom and r...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:552
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Commonwealth Bank

Commonwealth Bank

., Sydney, 2000, AU

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.commbank.com.au/
719/1000Moderate

Australia’s leading provider of financial services including retail, premium, business and institutional banking, funds management, superannuation, insurance, investment and sharebroking products and services. We are a business with more than 800,000 shareholders and o...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:48,108
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Afterpay

Afterpay

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Commonwealth Bank

Commonwealth Bank

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Afterpay in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Commonwealth Bank has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Afterpay (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Afterpay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Commonwealth Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Commonwealth Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Afterpay

Afterpay

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Commonwealth Bank

Commonwealth Bank

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
AUSCOMAUSAUS1788224259
🔒 Incident : Breach
ERNCOM1782793723
🔒 Incident : Breach
COM423251223

FAQ

Between Afterpay company and Commonwealth Bank company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Afterpay company and Commonwealth Bank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Afterpay company and Commonwealth Bank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Afterpay company and Commonwealth Bank company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Afterpay company and Commonwealth Bank company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Afterpay company and Commonwealth Bank company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Afterpay company and Commonwealth Bank company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Afterpay company and Commonwealth Bank company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Afterpay company and Commonwealth Bank company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Afterpay company and Commonwealth Bank company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Afterpay company and Commonwealth Bank company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Afterpay and Commonwealth Bank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Afterpay and Commonwealth Bank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Afterpay or Commonwealth Bank ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Afterpay or Commonwealth Bank ?
Between Afterpay and Commonwealth Bank, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Afterpay and Commonwealth Bank, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3