Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AFRL Regional Network - MidwestAFRL Regional Network - Midwest
VS
US NavyUS Navy
AFRL Regional Network - Midwest

AFRL Regional Network - Midwest

West Lafayette, US

Last Update: 25/02/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

The Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) Regional Network – Midwest is a new science and technology ecosystem comprised of universities, large and small businesses, other government agencies, and venture capitalists. The Midwest Network supports the AFRL by cultivating ...

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
US Navy

US Navy

1200 Navy Pentagon, Washington, 20350, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.navy.mil/
794/1000Fair

The United States is a maritime nation, and the U.S. Navy protects America at sea. Alongside our allies and partners, we defend freedom, preserve economic prosperity, and keep the seas open and free. Our nation is engaged in long-term competition. To defend American int...

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:161,815
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AFRL Regional Network - Midwest

AFRL Regional Network - Midwest

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
US Navy

US Navy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AFRL Regional Network - Midwest in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for US Navy in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AFRL Regional Network - Midwest (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AFRL Regional Network - Midwest cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - US Navy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

US Navy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AFRL Regional Network - Midwest

AFRL Regional Network - Midwest

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
US Navy

US Navy

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
US-005090624
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
US-425092125
🔒 Incident : Breach
USN2036171122

FAQ

Between AFRL Regional Network - Midwest company and US Navy company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AFRL Regional Network - Midwest company and US Navy company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AFRL Regional Network - Midwest company and US Navy company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AFRL Regional Network - Midwest company and US Navy company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AFRL Regional Network - Midwest company and US Navy company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AFRL Regional Network - Midwest company and US Navy company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AFRL Regional Network - Midwest company and US Navy company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AFRL Regional Network - Midwest company and US Navy company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AFRL Regional Network - Midwest company and US Navy company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AFRL Regional Network - Midwest company and US Navy company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AFRL Regional Network - Midwest company and US Navy company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AFRL Regional Network - Midwest and US Navy, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AFRL Regional Network - Midwest and US Navy, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AFRL Regional Network - Midwest or US Navy ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AFRL Regional Network - Midwest or US Navy ?
Between AFRL Regional Network - Midwest and US Navy, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AFRL Regional Network - Midwest and US Navy, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA