Comparison Overview
AF - Group

AF - Group
200 N. Grand Ave, Lansing, Michigan, US, 48801
Last Update: 05/03/2026
AF Group is a nationally recognized holding company whose affiliated insurance companies are premier providers of specialty insurance solutions offered through independent agents nationwide. All policies are underwritten by a licensed insurer subsidiary. For more inform...

Koç Holding
Nakkaştepe, Azizbey Sokak No: 1, Istanbul, 34674, TR
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Koç Holding is Turkey’s leading investment holding company and Koç Group is Turkey's largest industrial and services group in terms of revenues, exports, number of employees, taxes paid and market capitalization on Borsa Istanbul. Being the only Turkish company to be ra...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

AF - Group







Koç Holding






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Holding Companies Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for AF - Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Holding Companies Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Koç Holding in 2026.
Incident History - AF - Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AF - Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Koç Holding (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Koç Holding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

AF - Group

Koç Holding
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.