Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AFFLINK | A PFG CompanyAFFLINK | A PFG Company
VS
DKSHDKSH
AFFLINK | A PFG Company

AFFLINK | A PFG Company

1400 AFFLINK Place, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35406, US

Last Update: 27/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.afflink.com/
751/1000Fair

As the Home of The Independent, AFFLINK connects more than 300 Distributor Members and 250 Preferred Suppliers of Janitorial, Packaging, Foodservice, Healthcare, Safety, Industrial and Office products to thousands of customers, around the globe, everyday. By truly unde...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:132
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
DKSH

DKSH

Wiesenstrasse 8,, P.O. Box 888, Zurich, Zurich, CH, 8034

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dksh.com
768/1000Fair

About DKSH DKSH’s purpose is to enrich people’s lives. For 160 years, we have been marketing, selling, and distributing high-quality products and brands for multinational and Fortune 500 companies. Through our Business Units Consumer Goods, Healthcare, Performance Mater...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:12,373
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AFFLINK | A PFG Company

AFFLINK | A PFG Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DKSH

DKSH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AFFLINK | A PFG Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DKSH in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AFFLINK | A PFG Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AFFLINK | A PFG Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DKSH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DKSH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AFFLINK | A PFG Company

AFFLINK | A PFG Company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
DKSH

DKSH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between AFFLINK | A PFG Company company and DKSH company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AFFLINK | A PFG Company company and DKSH company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AFFLINK | A PFG Company company and DKSH company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AFFLINK | A PFG Company company and DKSH company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AFFLINK | A PFG Company company and DKSH company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AFFLINK | A PFG Company company and DKSH company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AFFLINK | A PFG Company company and DKSH company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AFFLINK | A PFG Company company and DKSH company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AFFLINK | A PFG Company company and DKSH company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AFFLINK | A PFG Company company and DKSH company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AFFLINK | A PFG Company company and DKSH company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AFFLINK | A PFG Company and DKSH, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AFFLINK | A PFG Company and DKSH, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AFFLINK | A PFG Company or DKSH ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AFFLINK | A PFG Company or DKSH ?
Between AFFLINK | A PFG Company and DKSH, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AFFLINK | A PFG Company and DKSH, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-84411
SUMMARY

The web management service in affected RouterOS versions contains an integer underflow in its HTTP request body handling that is reachable before authentication. This can be leveraged by an unauthenticated network attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution as root, or to cause a denial of service, using a single crafted request.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105051
SUMMARY

Denuvo Anti-Tamper through 2026-03-04 allows bypass of a hypervisor presence check via CPUID interception (SimpleSvm.sys on AMD; hyperkd.sys and hyperhv.dll on Intel).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 1.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
0.5
CVE-2026-105050
SUMMARY

PeaZip before 11.3.0, in a non-default configuration, is vulnerable to OS command injection via a filename in an archive because "quotation character already used in the string" is mishandled.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-105049
SUMMARY

Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 has a Playground feature that does not require authentication for proxying arbitrary HTTP and HTTPS requests to URLs on the public internet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105048
SUMMARY

The Playground feature of Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 allows SSRF (proxying of requests to private IP addresses).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2