Comparison Overview
Affinity Learning Partnership

Affinity Learning Partnership
C/O The de Ferrers Academy, Trent Campus, Burton-On-Trent, DE13 0LL, GB
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Affinity Learning Partnership is a mixed multi-academy trust based in Staffordshire and Derbyshire. The Trust currently consists of seven schools (three secondaries and four primaries). The Trust educates approximately 5500 children and young people between the ages...

Gwinnett County Public Schools
437 Old Peachtree Rd NW, Suwanee, 30024-2978, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Gwinnett County Public Schools (GCPS), located in the metro Atlanta area, is the largest school system in Georgia and the 11th largest school district in the country, offering education professionals and support staff endless opportunities to SHINE. GCPS is one of the ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Affinity Learning Partnership







Gwinnett County Public Schools






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Affinity Learning Partnership in 2026.
Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Gwinnett County Public Schools in 2026.
Incident History - Affinity Learning Partnership (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Affinity Learning Partnership cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Gwinnett County Public Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Gwinnett County Public Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Affinity Learning Partnership

Gwinnett County Public Schools
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.
The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.
The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.
With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.
The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.