Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AFC EnergyAFC Energy
VS
Siemens GamesaSiemens Gamesa
AFC Energy

AFC Energy

Unit 71.4 Dunsfold Park, Cranleigh, GU6 8TB, GB

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.afcenergy.com
752/1000Fair

AFC Energy is the leading provider of Hydrogen fuel cell technology to generate clean off-grid energy. It is commercialising scalable “fuel flexible” fuel cell systems, to provide clean power for off grid applications. The technology, pioneered since 2006 in the UK, is...

NAICS:33441
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:148
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Siemens Gamesa

Siemens Gamesa

Parque Tecnológico de Bizkaia, edificio 222, Zamudio, 48170, ES

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
798/1000Fair

Siemens Gamesa is a global technology leader in the renewable energy industry - specifically in the development, manufacturing, installation and maintenance of wind turbines. Being a pioneer in renewables since the 1980s, we put our scale and entrepreneurial culture to ...

NAICS:33441
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:20,344
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AFC Energy

AFC Energy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Siemens Gamesa

Siemens Gamesa

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Renewable Energy Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AFC Energy in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Renewable Energy Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Siemens Gamesa in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AFC Energy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AFC Energy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Siemens Gamesa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Siemens Gamesa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AFC Energy

AFC Energy

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Siemens Gamesa

Siemens Gamesa

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between AFC Energy company and Siemens Gamesa company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AFC Energy company and Siemens Gamesa company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AFC Energy company and Siemens Gamesa company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AFC Energy company and Siemens Gamesa company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AFC Energy company and Siemens Gamesa company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AFC Energy company and Siemens Gamesa company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AFC Energy company and Siemens Gamesa company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AFC Energy company and Siemens Gamesa company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AFC Energy company and Siemens Gamesa company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AFC Energy company and Siemens Gamesa company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AFC Energy company and Siemens Gamesa company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AFC Energy and Siemens Gamesa, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AFC Energy and Siemens Gamesa, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AFC Energy or Siemens Gamesa ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AFC Energy or Siemens Gamesa ?
Between AFC Energy and Siemens Gamesa, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AFC Energy and Siemens Gamesa, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA