Comparison Overview

Aetna, a CVS Health Company

VS

Purpose Brands, LLC

Aetna, a CVS Health Company

151 Farmington Avenue, Hartford, Connecticut, 06156, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Here at Aetna, a CVS Health® company, we’re building a healthier world by making health care easy, affordable and all about you. Because Healthier Happens Together™! Follow our page for company news, industry commentary, jobs and more. Founded in 1853 in Hartford, CT, Aetna® is one of the nation's leading diversified health care benefits companies, serving an estimated 39 million people with information and resources to help them make better decisions about their health. As a health care leader, we believe that our corporate responsibility starts with helping people live healthier lives. And that means using our resources to make the communities and the world we live in better places. Diversity & Inclusion: Our focus on diversity and inclusion reflects the world around us. Having a diverse group of employees gives us a broader and deeper view of how to serve the people and businesses in our communities. As part of CVS Health, over 70% of our workforce is comprised of women. Join us as we transform the health care system. Our employees are the cornerstone of our mission to help people live healthier lives. Get to know us, why we're passionate about what we do and what makes Aetna a great place to work.

NAICS: 71394
NAICS Definition: Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees: 39,368
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Purpose Brands, LLC

111 Weir Drive, None, Woodbury, MN, US, 55125
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 700 and 749

Purpose Brands, LLC provides fitness, nutrition and wellness support and services to more than 7,000 communities and millions of people around the world. We own and operate the world’s largest and most trusted portfolio of fitness, health and wellness franchise brands and services: Anytime Fitness, Orangetheory Fitness, Waxing the City, Basecamp Fitness/SUMHIIT Fitness, The Bar Method, Stronger U Nutrition, Healthy Contributions and Provision Security. Together, these brands generate USD$3.7 billion in revenue, operating across 50 countries on all seven continents with a combined 6 million members. We combine this portfolio with a world-class franchise operating model and suite of services that helps our brands and franchise owners accelerate growth and deliver exceptional member experiences. Above all, our culture, people and franchise owners share a commitment to personal wellness; a spirit of service to help those who seek to improve their own physical and mental wellbeing; tireless advocacy and innovation for fitness, health and wellness experiences; and a daily honor to earn the trust in our brands from our franchise owners and the people who help consumers on their personal wellness journeys.

NAICS: 71394
NAICS Definition: Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees: 28,436
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aetna.jpeg
Aetna, a CVS Health Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/purpose-brands-llc.jpeg
Purpose Brands, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aetna, a CVS Health Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Purpose Brands, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aetna, a CVS Health Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Purpose Brands, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Aetna, a CVS Health Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aetna, a CVS Health Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Purpose Brands, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Purpose Brands, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aetna.jpeg
Aetna, a CVS Health Company
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Human Error
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Internal System Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/purpose-brands-llc.jpeg
Purpose Brands, LLC
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Aetna, a CVS Health Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Purpose Brands, LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Aetna, a CVS Health Company company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Purpose Brands, LLC company.

In the current year, Purpose Brands, LLC company and Aetna, a CVS Health Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Purpose Brands, LLC company nor Aetna, a CVS Health Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Purpose Brands, LLC company and Aetna, a CVS Health Company company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Purpose Brands, LLC company nor Aetna, a CVS Health Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Aetna, a CVS Health Company company nor Purpose Brands, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aetna, a CVS Health Company nor Purpose Brands, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Aetna, a CVS Health Company company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Purpose Brands, LLC company.

Aetna, a CVS Health Company company employs more people globally than Purpose Brands, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Wellness and Fitness Services.

Neither Aetna, a CVS Health Company nor Purpose Brands, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aetna, a CVS Health Company nor Purpose Brands, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aetna, a CVS Health Company nor Purpose Brands, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aetna, a CVS Health Company nor Purpose Brands, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aetna, a CVS Health Company nor Purpose Brands, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aetna, a CVS Health Company nor Purpose Brands, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H