Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Aerotec & ConceptAerotec & Concept
VS
B/E AerospaceB/E Aerospace
Aerotec & Concept

Aerotec & Concept

13, Rue Marie-Louise Dissard, Toulouse, 31300, FR

Last Update: 09/02/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.aerotec.fr
746/1000Moderate

AEROTEC & CONCEPT, société de maintenance et production aéronautique est une PME en plein développement. Créée en 1989 à Graulhet, AEROTEC & CONCEPT est aujourd’hui adossée au groupe Expleo. Forte d’une équipe de taille humaine, attachée à l’obsession du client (plutôt...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:111
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
B/E Aerospace

B/E Aerospace

Corporate Headquarters, Cedar Rapids, US

Last Update: 03/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.beaerospace.com
768/1000Fair

B/E Aerospace is now part of Rockwell Collins. With the acquisition of B/E Aerospace in April 2017, Rockwell Collins is now a world leader in designing, developing and manufacturing cabin interior products and services that deliver innovation, reliability and efficien...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:12,025
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Aerotec & Concept

Aerotec & Concept

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
B/E Aerospace

B/E Aerospace

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aerotec & Concept in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for B/E Aerospace in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Aerotec & Concept (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aerotec & Concept cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - B/E Aerospace (X = Date, Y = Severity)

B/E Aerospace cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Aerotec & Concept

Aerotec & Concept

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
B/E Aerospace

B/E Aerospace

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Aerotec & Concept company and B/E Aerospace company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Aerotec & Concept company and B/E Aerospace company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Aerotec & Concept company and B/E Aerospace company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Aerotec & Concept company and B/E Aerospace company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Aerotec & Concept company and B/E Aerospace company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Aerotec & Concept company and B/E Aerospace company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Aerotec & Concept company and B/E Aerospace company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Aerotec & Concept company and B/E Aerospace company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Aerotec & Concept company and B/E Aerospace company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Aerotec & Concept company and B/E Aerospace company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Aerotec & Concept company and B/E Aerospace company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Aerotec & Concept and B/E Aerospace, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Aerotec & Concept and B/E Aerospace, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Aerotec & Concept or B/E Aerospace ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Aerotec & Concept or B/E Aerospace ?
Between Aerotec & Concept and B/E Aerospace, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Aerotec & Concept and B/E Aerospace, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8