Comparison Overview

Aeropuertos GAP

VS

GOL Linhas Aéreas

Aeropuertos GAP

Avenida Mariano Otero No. 1249-B Piso 6, Torre Pacífico, Rinconada del Bosque, , None, Guadalajara, , Jalisco , MX, C.P. 44530
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aeropuertosgap.com.mx

Somos una empresa mexicana que desarrolla su actividad en el sector aeroportuario. Operamos 12 aeropuertos internacionales en México y 2 en Jamaica, sirviendo en conjunto a más de 350 destinos, a través de 37 aerolíneas. En 2022, atendimos a 56.7 millones de pasajeros. Creemos en el valor de cada individuo y buscamos detonar su potencial por medio de la Fundación GAP integrada por los Colegios GAP y los Centros Comunitarios de Formación que ofrecen educación de calidad a familias de bajos recursos y oportunidades para elevar la calidad de vida a la comunidad aeroportuaria.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 782
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

GOL Linhas Aéreas

Pça Comandante Linneu Gomes, Portaria 3, São Paulo, SP, BR, 04626-900
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
http://www.voegol.com.br

Somos a maior Companhia Aérea do País e estamos entre as que mais crescem no mundo. A nossa história começou em 2001 e, desde então, somos responsáveis por inovar o mercado da aviação no Brasil. Tudo isso graças à dedicação do nosso Time para garantir o nosso Valor número 1, a Segurança, entregando sempre a melhor experiência em voar. Carregamos em nossa bagagem o respeito para promover a diversidade e a inclusão em nosso ambiente de trabalho, valorizando o talento das nossas Águias e seguindo nosso propósito de ser a Primeira para Todos, seja no solo ou no céu. Além disso, criamos uma série de facilidades que tornam as viagens dos nossos Clientes ainda mais tranquilas, como: Novo App, Selfie Check-in, GOL+ Conforto, Programa de fidelidade da Smiles e Entretenimento a bordo. Com a laranjinha, você voa mais alto e leva a nossa essência Simples, Humana e Inteligente em todas as decolagens.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 16,049
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aeropuertosgap.jpeg
Aeropuertos GAP
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gol.jpeg
GOL Linhas Aéreas
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aeropuertos GAP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GOL Linhas Aéreas
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aeropuertos GAP in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GOL Linhas Aéreas in 2025.

Incident History — Aeropuertos GAP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aeropuertos GAP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GOL Linhas Aéreas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GOL Linhas Aéreas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aeropuertosgap.jpeg
Aeropuertos GAP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gol.jpeg
GOL Linhas Aéreas
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GOL Linhas Aéreas company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aeropuertos GAP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, GOL Linhas Aéreas company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Aeropuertos GAP company.

In the current year, GOL Linhas Aéreas company and Aeropuertos GAP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GOL Linhas Aéreas company nor Aeropuertos GAP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GOL Linhas Aéreas company nor Aeropuertos GAP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GOL Linhas Aéreas company nor Aeropuertos GAP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP company nor GOL Linhas Aéreas company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor GOL Linhas Aéreas holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP company nor GOL Linhas Aéreas company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

GOL Linhas Aéreas company employs more people globally than Aeropuertos GAP company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor GOL Linhas Aéreas holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor GOL Linhas Aéreas holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor GOL Linhas Aéreas holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor GOL Linhas Aéreas holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor GOL Linhas Aéreas holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor GOL Linhas Aéreas holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References