Comparison Overview

Aeropuertos GAP

VS

American Airlines

Aeropuertos GAP

Avenida Mariano Otero No. 1249-B Piso 6, Torre Pacífico, Rinconada del Bosque, , None, Guadalajara, , Jalisco , MX, C.P. 44530
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aeropuertosgap.com.mx

Somos una empresa mexicana que desarrolla su actividad en el sector aeroportuario. Operamos 12 aeropuertos internacionales en México y 2 en Jamaica, sirviendo en conjunto a más de 350 destinos, a través de 37 aerolíneas. En 2022, atendimos a 56.7 millones de pasajeros. Creemos en el valor de cada individuo y buscamos detonar su potencial por medio de la Fundación GAP integrada por los Colegios GAP y los Centros Comunitarios de Formación que ofrecen educación de calidad a familias de bajos recursos y oportunidades para elevar la calidad de vida a la comunidad aeroportuaria.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 782
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

American Airlines

Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 600 and 649
http://jobs.aa.com

Embark on an adventure with a commitment to service, excellence and humanity. Our team is what powers our airline. We are proudly dedicated to our purpose of caring for people on life’s journey, including connecting our customers to the people and places they love or providing our team members development and leadership opportunities to acquire new skills and explore their potential. With more than 1,300 aircraft in our mainline and regional fleets combined and an extensive route network that touches six continents, we’ve got a place for you to start — or continue — your career. Whether you’re stationed at one of our hundreds of airports, working out of our state-of-the-art headquarters in Fort Worth, Texas, or serving customers over the phone from your home office, there are endless opportunities for you to grow and lead at American.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 57,213
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aeropuertosgap.jpeg
Aeropuertos GAP
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-airlines.jpeg
American Airlines
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aeropuertos GAP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
American Airlines
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aeropuertos GAP in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

American Airlines has 61.29% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Aeropuertos GAP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aeropuertos GAP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — American Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aeropuertosgap.jpeg
Aeropuertos GAP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-airlines.jpeg
American Airlines
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External System Hacking
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Aeropuertos GAP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to American Airlines company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

American Airlines company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Aeropuertos GAP company has not reported any.

In the current year, American Airlines company has reported more cyber incidents than Aeropuertos GAP company.

Neither American Airlines company nor Aeropuertos GAP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

American Airlines company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Aeropuertos GAP company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither American Airlines company nor Aeropuertos GAP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP company nor American Airlines company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor American Airlines holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

American Airlines company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Aeropuertos GAP company.

American Airlines company employs more people globally than Aeropuertos GAP company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor American Airlines holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor American Airlines holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor American Airlines holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor American Airlines holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor American Airlines holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aeropuertos GAP nor American Airlines holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References