Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AeroGroundAeroGround
VS
JetBlueJetBlue
AeroGround

AeroGround

Nordallee 25, München, 85326, DE

Last Update: 03/05/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.aeroground.de
478/1000Critical

AeroGround - Your reliable partner AeroGround Flughafen München GmbH and AeroGround Berlin GmbH – AeroGround Munich & Berlin for short – offer all landside and airside services for aircraft, baggage and passenger handling at Munich Airport (MUC) and Berlin Brandenburg (...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:189
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
JetBlue

JetBlue

27-01 Queens Plaza North, Long Island City, New York, US, 11101

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jetblue.com
784/1000Fair

JetBlue — New York's Hometown Airline — was born at JFK in 1999 with the mission of bringing humanity back to air travel, and is now a leading carrier in NYC, Boston, Fort Lauderdale, Orlando, and San Juan. JetBlue serves 40M+ customers annually, with low fares and awar...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:17,235
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AeroGround

AeroGround

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
JetBlue

JetBlue

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AeroGround in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JetBlue in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AeroGround (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AeroGround cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - JetBlue (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JetBlue cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AeroGround

AeroGround

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
COL4492344101825
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DUB5062050092225
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
COL4541545100525
JetBlue

JetBlue

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between AeroGround company and JetBlue company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AeroGround company and JetBlue company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AeroGround company and JetBlue company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AeroGround company and JetBlue company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AeroGround company and JetBlue company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AeroGround company and JetBlue company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AeroGround company and JetBlue company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AeroGround company and JetBlue company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AeroGround company and JetBlue company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AeroGround company and JetBlue company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AeroGround company and JetBlue company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AeroGround and JetBlue, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AeroGround and JetBlue, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AeroGround or JetBlue ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AeroGround or JetBlue ?
Between AeroGround and JetBlue, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AeroGround and JetBlue, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8