Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AERODYNE GROUPAERODYNE GROUP
VS
TextronTextron
AERODYNE GROUP

AERODYNE GROUP

Persiaran Cyber Point Selatan, Cyber 8, Cyberjaya, 63000, MY

Last Update: 21/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aerodyne.group
750/1000Fair

Aerodyne is a leading 360DT3 drone-based enterprise solutions provider, ranked as the world's #1 drone service provider for two consecutive years by Drone Industry Insights (DII) in 2021 and 2022. Our holistic approach to Drone Tech, Data Tech, and Digital Transformatio...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:469
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Textron

Textron

40 Westminster, Providence, 02903, US

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.textron.com
781/1000Fair

Textron Inc. is a multi-industry company that leverages its global network of aircraft, defense, industrial and finance businesses to provide customers with innovative solutions and services. Textron is known around the world for its powerful brands such as Bell, Cessna...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:26,869
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AERODYNE GROUP

AERODYNE GROUP

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Textron

Textron

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AERODYNE GROUP in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Textron in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AERODYNE GROUP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AERODYNE GROUP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Textron (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Textron cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AERODYNE GROUP

AERODYNE GROUP

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Textron

Textron

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between AERODYNE GROUP company and Textron company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AERODYNE GROUP company and Textron company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AERODYNE GROUP company and Textron company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AERODYNE GROUP company and Textron company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AERODYNE GROUP company and Textron company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AERODYNE GROUP company and Textron company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AERODYNE GROUP company and Textron company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AERODYNE GROUP company and Textron company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AERODYNE GROUP company and Textron company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AERODYNE GROUP company and Textron company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AERODYNE GROUP company and Textron company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AERODYNE GROUP and Textron, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AERODYNE GROUP and Textron, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AERODYNE GROUP or Textron ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AERODYNE GROUP or Textron ?
Between AERODYNE GROUP and Textron, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AERODYNE GROUP and Textron, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8