Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AerCapAerCap
VS
SpiceJet LimitedSpiceJet Limited
AerCap

AerCap

AerCap House, Dublin, undefined, D02 YX20, IE

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aercap.com
795/1000Fair

AerCap is the global leader in aviation leasing with one of the most attractive order books in the industry. AerCap serves approximately 300 customers around the world with comprehensive fleet solutions. AerCap is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (AER) and is based...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:758
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SpiceJet Limited

SpiceJet Limited

319, Udyog Vihar,, Gurgaon, 122016, IN

Last Update: 04/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.spicejet.com
709/1000Moderate

Red. Hot. Spicy. That’s not just our tagline, it’s how we fly. Red reflects the bold spirit we bring to every journey, energetic, passionate, and full of heart. Hot captures the warmth of our service and the vibrant destinations we connect. Spicy is our drive to keep tr...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:10,853
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AerCap

AerCap

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SpiceJet Limited

SpiceJet Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AerCap in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SpiceJet Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AerCap (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AerCap cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SpiceJet Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SpiceJet Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AerCap

AerCap

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SpiceJet Limited

SpiceJet Limited

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SPI04326522

FAQ

Between AerCap company and SpiceJet Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AerCap company and SpiceJet Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AerCap company and SpiceJet Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AerCap company and SpiceJet Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AerCap company and SpiceJet Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AerCap company and SpiceJet Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AerCap company and SpiceJet Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AerCap company and SpiceJet Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AerCap company and SpiceJet Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AerCap company and SpiceJet Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AerCap company and SpiceJet Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AerCap and SpiceJet Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AerCap and SpiceJet Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AerCap or SpiceJet Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AerCap or SpiceJet Limited ?
Between AerCap and SpiceJet Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AerCap and SpiceJet Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA