Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AEP Economic & Business DevelopmentAEP Economic & Business Development
VS
Dominion EnergyDominion Energy
AEP Economic & Business Development

AEP Economic & Business Development

N/A

Last Update: 06/03/2026

View Profile
751/1000Fair

For over a century, AEP has been helping our customers succeed and hometowns prosper. Based on our boundless commitment to our communities and the role energy plays in business operations, we provide comprehensive support for businesses relocating or expanding in the AE...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:4
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Dominion Energy

Dominion Energy

120 Tredegar Street, Richmond, 23219, US

Last Update: 09/09/2026

View Profile
808/1000Good

Dominion Energy (NYSE: D), headquartered in Richmond, Va., provides regulated electricity service to 3.6 million homes and businesses in Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina, and regulated natural gas service to 500,000 customers in South Carolina. The company i...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:27,508
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AEP Economic & Business Development

AEP Economic & Business Development

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Dominion Energy

Dominion Energy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AEP Economic & Business Development in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dominion Energy in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AEP Economic & Business Development (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AEP Economic & Business Development cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Dominion Energy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dominion Energy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AEP Economic & Business Development

AEP Economic & Business Development

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Dominion Energy

Dominion Energy

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DOM2433024102725

FAQ

Between AEP Economic & Business Development company and Dominion Energy company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AEP Economic & Business Development company and Dominion Energy company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AEP Economic & Business Development company and Dominion Energy company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AEP Economic & Business Development company and Dominion Energy company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AEP Economic & Business Development company and Dominion Energy company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AEP Economic & Business Development company and Dominion Energy company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AEP Economic & Business Development company and Dominion Energy company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AEP Economic & Business Development company and Dominion Energy company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AEP Economic & Business Development company and Dominion Energy company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AEP Economic & Business Development company and Dominion Energy company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AEP Economic & Business Development company and Dominion Energy company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AEP Economic & Business Development and Dominion Energy, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AEP Economic & Business Development and Dominion Energy, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AEP Economic & Business Development or Dominion Energy ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AEP Economic & Business Development or Dominion Energy ?
Between AEP Economic & Business Development and Dominion Energy, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AEP Economic & Business Development and Dominion Energy, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA