Comparison Overview
Agencia Española de Protección de Datos - AEPD

Agencia Española de Protección de Datos - AEPD
Paseo de la Castellana, 141, Madrid, Community of Madrid, ES, 28046
Last Update: 17/09/2026
La Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) es la autoridad estatal de control independiente encargada de velar por el cumplimiento de la normativa sobre protección de datos en España. La AEPD garantiza y tutela el derecho fundamental a la protección de datos de ...

EDP
Av. 24 de Julho, Lisboa, 1249 - 300, PT
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Our story began 50 years ago. Today, we are a global energy company leading the transition to a more sustainable future. We produce and deliver electricity to millions of families, businesses and communities worldwide, with a strong focus on renewable energy. More than...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Agencia Española de Protección de Datos - AEPD







EDP






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)
Agencia Española de Protección de Datos - AEPD has 45.36% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for EDP in 2026.
Incident History - Agencia Española de Protección de Datos - AEPD (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Agencia Española de Protección de Datos - AEPD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - EDP (X = Date, Y = Severity)
EDP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Agencia Española de Protección de Datos - AEPD

EDP
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.