Comparison Overview
AMETEK MRO AEM

AMETEK MRO AEM
Stansted (Head Office) Taylor’s End Stansted Airport , Stansted Airport, CM24 1RB , GB
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Since 1959, AMETEK MRO AEM has been Europe's leading independent overhaul and repair facility. The company has approximately 220 employees and a turnover in excess of $40 million. We have three UK sites: Stansted Airport in Essex, Luton Airport in Bedfordshire and R...

easyJet
Hangar 89, London Luton Airport, GB, LU2 9PF
Last Update: 13/09/2026
We’re on a mission to make low-cost travel easy. Whatever your role, you’ll connect millions of people to what they love using Europe’s best airline network, great value fares, and friendly service. And to help us get there we’ll give you everything you need to make a ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

AMETEK MRO AEM







easyJet






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for AMETEK MRO AEM in 2026.
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for easyJet in 2026.
Incident History - AMETEK MRO AEM (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AMETEK MRO AEM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - easyJet (X = Date, Y = Severity)
easyJet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

AMETEK MRO AEM

easyJet
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.
The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.
The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.
With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.
The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.