Comparison Overview
AMETEK MRO AEM

AMETEK MRO AEM
Stansted (Head Office) Taylor’s End Stansted Airport , Stansted Airport, CM24 1RB , GB
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Since 1959, AMETEK MRO AEM has been Europe's leading independent overhaul and repair facility. The company has approximately 220 employees and a turnover in excess of $40 million. We have three UK sites: Stansted Airport in Essex, Luton Airport in Bedfordshire and R...

Aeromexico
MX
Last Update: 22/09/2026
Grupo Aeromexico, S.A.B. de C.V. is a holding company whose subsidiaries are engaged in commercial aviation and the promotion of passenger loyalty programs in Mexico. Aeromexico, Mexico’s global airline, operates more than 600 daily flights and has its main hub in Termi...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

AMETEK MRO AEM







Aeromexico






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for AMETEK MRO AEM in 2026.
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
Aeromexico has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - AMETEK MRO AEM (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AMETEK MRO AEM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Aeromexico (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Aeromexico cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

AMETEK MRO AEM

Aeromexico
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.