Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

[Archived][Archived]
VS
PortoPorto
[Archived]

[Archived]

İstanbul, İstanbul, TR

Last Update: 20/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.aegon.com.tr
827/1000Good

Aegon, 1993 yılında Orta ve Doğu Avrupa'da başlayan büyüme serüvenini bölgenin yükselen değeri olarak gördüğü Türkiye ile devam ettirmek istemiş ve bu arzusunu 2008 Temmuz'unda gerçekleştirmiştir. Bu çerçevede, hayat sigortası ve emeklilik alanında faaliyet gösteren...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:405
Subsidiaries:55
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Porto

Porto

Avenida Rio Branco, 1489, Sao Paulo, SP, BR, 01205-001

Last Update: 19/07/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://porto.vc/linkedin
648/1000Poor

A Porto é mais que uma seguradora, é um ecossistema de soluções de serviços de proteção com tecnologia embarcada, para melhorar e facilitar a experiência do cliente. Com mais de 70 anos de mercado, a atuação da companhia se concentra hoje em quatro pilares estratégicos ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:24,464
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
[Archived]

[Archived]

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Porto

Porto

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for [Archived] in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Porto in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - [Archived] (X = Date, Y = Severity)

[Archived] cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Porto (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Porto cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
[Archived]

[Archived]

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Porto

Porto

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
POR3692036090725
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
POR4102041102125

FAQ

Between [Archived] company and Porto company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between [Archived] company and Porto company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between [Archived] company and Porto company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between [Archived] company and Porto company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between [Archived] company and Porto company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between [Archived] company and Porto company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between [Archived] company and Porto company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between [Archived] company and Porto company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between [Archived] company and Porto company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between [Archived] company and Porto company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between [Archived] company and Porto company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between [Archived] and Porto, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between [Archived] and Porto, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - [Archived] or Porto ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - [Archived] or Porto ?
Between [Archived] and Porto, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between [Archived] and Porto, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9