Comparison Overview
Advocate Condell Medical Center
Advocate Condell Medical Center
801 S Milwaukee Ave, Libertyville, 60048, US
Last Update: 17/03/2026
Advocate Condell Medical Center has been providing high quality care to residents in the north suburbs for more than 80 years. Thank you for participating and engaging with Advocate Health Care on social media. Comments and engagement on our social media platforms are ...
Mayo Clinic
200 First St. S.W., Rochester, Minnesota, US, 55905
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Mayo Clinic has expanded and changed in many ways, but our values remain true to the vision of our founders. Our primary value – The needs of the patient come first – guides our plans and decisions as we create the future of health care. Join us and you'll find a cultur...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Advocate Condell Medical Center
Mayo Clinic
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Advocate Condell Medical Center in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
Mayo Clinic has 8.26% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Advocate Condell Medical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Advocate Condell Medical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Mayo Clinic (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mayo Clinic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Advocate Condell Medical Center
Mayo Clinic
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in ealpha072 Student-Management-System up to 01451bd7a2f58cdda07bd0b86e3967582e3ecd08. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file admin/config.php of the component Administrative Backend. Such manipulation leads to improper authentication. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A vulnerability was determined in sgl-project SGLang up to 0.5.11. Affected by this vulnerability is the function data_hash of the component Cache Handler. This manipulation causes denial of service. The attack is restricted to local execution. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
Active IQ OneCollect version 2.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.
Active IQ Config Advisor version 6.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.
A vulnerability was found in crmeb crmeb_java 1.4. Affected is the function RestTemplate.getForEntity of the file crmeb-common/src/main/java/com/zbkj/common/utils/RestTemplateUtil.java of the component base64 Qrcode Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.