Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ADTADT
VS
Great Clips Inc.Great Clips Inc.
ADT

ADT

1501 Yamato Road, Boca Raton, 33431, US

Last Update: 12/06/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.adt.com/
303/1000Critical

ADT is the most trusted name in smart home security, helping protect and connect what matters most at home and beyond. When Every Second Counts, Count on ADT 💙.

NAICS:81
NAICS Definition:Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees:25,890
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
8
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
3
Great Clips Inc.

Great Clips Inc.

4400 W. 78th St., Minneapolis, 55435, US

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://jobs.greatclips.com/
789/1000Fair

Established in Minneapolis in 1982, Great Clips has grown to be the world's largest and fastest growing salon brand. There are more than 4,400 salons throughout the United States and Canada -- all of them owned by franchisees. Visit us at www.greatclips.com Employment ...

NAICS:81
NAICS Definition:Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees:12,810
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ADT

ADT

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Great Clips Inc.

Great Clips Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)

ADT has 529.92% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Great Clips Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ADT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ADT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Great Clips Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Great Clips Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ADT

ADT

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CHA1779582281
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CARADTSALCUS1778027258
🔒 Incident : Breach
ADT1777934120
Great Clips Inc.

Great Clips Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ADT company and Great Clips Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ADT company and Great Clips Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ADT company and Great Clips Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ADT company and Great Clips Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ADT company and Great Clips Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ADT company and Great Clips Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ADT company and Great Clips Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ADT company and Great Clips Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ADT company and Great Clips Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ADT company and Great Clips Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ADT company and Great Clips Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ADT and Great Clips Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ADT and Great Clips Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ADT or Great Clips Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ADT or Great Clips Inc. ?
Between ADT and Great Clips Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ADT and Great Clips Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2