Comparison Overview
ADT Security Australia
ADT Security Australia
38 South Street, Rydalmere, 2116, AU
Last Update: 31/01/2026
For more than 130 years, we have stood alongside our community, protecting homes, families, businesses, and communities. At ADT Security, our strength comes from the people we serve, our long-standing partnerships, and our shared commitment to creating a safer environme...
Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços
Avenida Professor Francisco Morato 525, São Paulo, 05513-000, BR
Last Update: 01/04/2026
One of the largest companies in the professional services and security markets in Brazil. Formed by four branches, patrimonial security, personal security, electronic security and general services. Counting with around 16.000 employees, Gocil is present at several brazi...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
ADT Security Australia
Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ADT Security Australia in 2026.
Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços in 2026.
Incident History - ADT Security Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ADT Security Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
ADT Security Australia
Gocil Tecnologia em Segurança e Serviços
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.
An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.
The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.
An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.
A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.