Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Alabama Department of Public HealthAlabama Department of Public Health
VS
National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI)National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI)
Alabama Department of Public Health

Alabama Department of Public Health

201 Monroe Street, Montgomery, 36104, US

Last Update: 23/06/2026

View Profile
664/1000Weak

The Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH) is the state's primary health agency. With approximately 2,700 employees, ADPH is one of the largest state agencies. ADPH aims to provide public health "services for the improvement and protection of the public’s health thr...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:1,593
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI)

National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI)

Av. Héroe de Nacozari Sur 2301, Aguascalientes, 20276, MX

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.inegi.org.mx
776/1000Fair

The National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) is an autonomous institution of the Federal Public Sector. INEGI is the coordinator of the National System of Statistical and Geographical Information of Mexico. The main objective of INEGI is to pr...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:12,384
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Alabama Department of Public Health

Alabama Department of Public Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI)

National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

Alabama Department of Public Health has 33.77% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Alabama Department of Public Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alabama Department of Public Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Alabama Department of Public Health

Alabama Department of Public Health

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CENAARADP1782189003
National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI)

National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Alabama Department of Public Health company and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Alabama Department of Public Health company and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Alabama Department of Public Health company and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Alabama Department of Public Health company and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Alabama Department of Public Health company and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Alabama Department of Public Health company and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Alabama Department of Public Health company and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Alabama Department of Public Health company and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Alabama Department of Public Health company and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Alabama Department of Public Health company and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Alabama Department of Public Health company and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Alabama Department of Public Health and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Alabama Department of Public Health and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Alabama Department of Public Health or National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Alabama Department of Public Health or National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) ?
Between Alabama Department of Public Health and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Alabama Department of Public Health and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94426
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in xuxueli xxl-job up to 3.5.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /jobgroup/insert. This manipulation of the argument Name causes cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-94425
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in Moore Threads MTT S80 Driver Package 340.150. The affected element is the function sub_140006F0C in the library mtdispkm64.sys of the component IOCTL Handler. The manipulation results in improper privilege management. Attacking locally is a requirement. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2
CVE-2026-94627
SUMMARY

vLLM Mooncake connector through 0.29.0 fails to properly manage GPU KV cache block ownership when concurrent child requests share a single transfer ID in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments. Attackers can trigger GPU memory exhaustion by submitting completion requests with multiple prompts, causing orphaned KV cache blocks to accumulate until process restart and eventually preventing legitimate requests from executing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94626
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 fails to validate the tp_size parameter in kv_transfer_params on OpenAI-compatible completion endpoints, allowing attackers to allocate unbounded memory. Attackers can supply arbitrary tp_size values in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments to exhaust memory and trigger kernel OOM-kill of the decode worker process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94625
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 contains a resource exhaustion vulnerability in MooncakeConnector where rejected prefill requests create ownerless transfer placeholders that are never reclaimed. Attackers can send rejected requests to exhaust sender task pools, causing valid requests to be delayed by up to 480 seconds while health checks continue returning success.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9