Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Adobe for BusinessAdobe for Business
VS
Wolters KluwerWolters Kluwer
Adobe for Business

Adobe for Business

345 Park Ave, San Jose, California, US, 95110

Last Update: 13/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://business.adobe.com/
774/1000Fair

Adobe solutions are purpose-built to create unified customer experiences — supercharged by AI, real-time insights, and seamless content creation and management tools — so you can deliver personalization at scale. That's why business runs on Adobe.

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Wolters Kluwer

Wolters Kluwer

Zuidpoolsingel 2, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2400 BA, NL

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.wolterskluwer.com
751/1000Fair

Wolters Kluwer (EURONEXT: WKL) is a global leader in information, software solutions, and services for professionals in healthcare; tax and accounting; financial and corporate compliance; legal and regulatory; corporate performance and ESG. We help our customers make cr...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:22,994
Subsidiaries:44
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Adobe for Business

Adobe for Business

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Wolters Kluwer

Wolters Kluwer

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Adobe for Business in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wolters Kluwer in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Adobe for Business (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Adobe for Business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Wolters Kluwer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wolters Kluwer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Adobe for Business

Adobe for Business

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Wolters Kluwer

Wolters Kluwer

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
WOL443041425

FAQ

Between Adobe for Business company and Wolters Kluwer company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Adobe for Business company and Wolters Kluwer company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Adobe for Business company and Wolters Kluwer company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Adobe for Business company and Wolters Kluwer company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Adobe for Business company and Wolters Kluwer company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Adobe for Business company and Wolters Kluwer company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Adobe for Business company and Wolters Kluwer company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Adobe for Business company and Wolters Kluwer company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Adobe for Business company and Wolters Kluwer company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Adobe for Business company and Wolters Kluwer company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Adobe for Business company and Wolters Kluwer company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Adobe for Business and Wolters Kluwer, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Adobe for Business and Wolters Kluwer, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Adobe for Business or Wolters Kluwer ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Adobe for Business or Wolters Kluwer ?
Between Adobe for Business and Wolters Kluwer, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Adobe for Business and Wolters Kluwer, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES