Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company LimitedAditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited
VS
MapfreMapfre
Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited

Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited

9th Floor, Tower 1, One Indiabulls Centre, Jupiter Mills Compound, 841, , Mumbai , Maharashtra, 400013, IN

Last Update: 27/03/2026

View Profile

Aditya Birla Health Insurance Co. Limited (“ABHICL”) was incorporated in 2015 as a 51:49 joint venture between MMI Strategic Investments (Pty) Ltd, MMI Holdings Limited, Aditya Birla Nuvo Limited and Aditya Birla Capital Limited (ABCL). ABHICL commenced its operations i...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:4,175
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Mapfre

Mapfre

Carretera de Pozuelo, 52, Majadahonda, Community of Madrid, ES, 28220

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mapfre.com
785/1000Fair

At Mapfre, we’ve spent more than 90 years supporting people and businesses around the world, taking care of what matters most to them. We offer insurance, financial, and service solutions that evolve with you. Our experience and commitment, combined with a constant focu...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:37,331
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited

Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mapfre

Mapfre

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mapfre in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mapfre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mapfre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited

Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Mapfre

Mapfre

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited company and Mapfre company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited company and Mapfre company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited company and Mapfre company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited company and Mapfre company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited company and Mapfre company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited company and Mapfre company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited company and Mapfre company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited company and Mapfre company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited company and Mapfre company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited company and Mapfre company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited company and Mapfre company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited and Mapfre, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited and Mapfre, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited or Mapfre ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited or Mapfre ?
Between Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited and Mapfre, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Aditya Birla Health Insurance Company Limited and Mapfre, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA