Comparison Overview

adidas

VS

Bill Jacksons Shop for Adventure

adidas

World of Sports, Adi-Dassler-Strasse 1, Herzogenaurach, Bavaria, DE, 91074
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 700 and 749

Inspired by our heritage, our brand is rooted in sports and the culture born from it. Headquartered in Herzogenaurach, Germany, we’re a global leader in the sporting goods industry, employing 62,035 worldwide.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 75,452
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Bill Jacksons Shop for Adventure

33782, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

Outdoor outfitter for scuba, snow skiing, kayaking, camping, backpacking, stand up paddleboarding, hunting, fly fishing, in-line skating, triathlons, nordic walking and metal detecting. Founded in 1945 as an army navy surplus store, Bill Jacksons has grown into one of the premier outfitters in the south and by far the best outfitter in Florida. The store was featured in one of the national Visa television commercial in 1986 stating that if you come to Bill Jacksons, bring your Visa because they don't take Am Ex. It was and still is the longest running Visa ad of that type in history.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adidas.jpeg
adidas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Bill Jacksons Shop for Adventure
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
adidas
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bill Jacksons Shop for Adventure
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

adidas has 198.51% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bill Jacksons Shop for Adventure in 2025.

Incident History — adidas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

adidas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bill Jacksons Shop for Adventure (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bill Jacksons Shop for Adventure cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adidas.jpeg
adidas
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Third-party compromise
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Bill Jacksons Shop for Adventure
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bill Jacksons Shop for Adventure company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to adidas company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

adidas company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Bill Jacksons Shop for Adventure company has not reported any.

In the current year, adidas company has reported more cyber incidents than Bill Jacksons Shop for Adventure company.

Neither Bill Jacksons Shop for Adventure company nor adidas company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

adidas company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Bill Jacksons Shop for Adventure company has not reported such incidents publicly.

adidas company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Bill Jacksons Shop for Adventure company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither adidas company nor Bill Jacksons Shop for Adventure company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither adidas nor Bill Jacksons Shop for Adventure holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither adidas company nor Bill Jacksons Shop for Adventure company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

adidas company employs more people globally than Bill Jacksons Shop for Adventure company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither adidas nor Bill Jacksons Shop for Adventure holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither adidas nor Bill Jacksons Shop for Adventure holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither adidas nor Bill Jacksons Shop for Adventure holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither adidas nor Bill Jacksons Shop for Adventure holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither adidas nor Bill Jacksons Shop for Adventure holds HIPAA certification.

Neither adidas nor Bill Jacksons Shop for Adventure holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H