Comparison Overview

Adaptive Engineering Lab (AEL)

VS

Massachusetts General Hospital

Adaptive Engineering Lab (AEL)

102 E Keefe Ave, Milwaukee, WI, 53212, US
Last Update: 2025-03-12 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Adaptive Engineering Lab (AEL) is a wheelchair seating and positioning manufacturer with over 40 years of experience serving adults, pediatrics, rehab and long term care. ABOUT AEL "Our values are sacred... but our commitment to transformation is everything"โ€‹ โ€”Brant Stanford, Chairman of AEL OUR MISSION To provide innovative Complex Rehab Technology (CRT) solutions that enhance the quality of life for people with disabilities OUR VISION Our vision is a world in which every person with a disability has access to the CRT technology they need to meet their medical needs and maximize their function and independence. OUR VALUES Passion We are passionate about our products and the effect they have on the lives of those who need them Details No detail is too small when it comes to product design Efficiency With over 40 years of experience, we strive to show the highest level of efficiency at all levels of our business Creativity We challenge ourselves to improve upon the status quo by thinking outside of the box Dependability We are dependable and so must be our products. We strive to deliver on our commitments and to provide high quality products that you can rely on. With 40 Years of Expertise See the Difference Experience Makes

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Massachusetts General Hospital

55 Fruit Street, None, Boston, MA, US, 02114
Last Update: 2025-07-26 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Guided by the needs of our patients and their families, Massachusetts General Hospital aims to deliver the very best health care in a safe, compassionate environment; to advance that care through innovative research and education; and, to improve the health and well-being of the diverse communities we serve. Visit our careers page! http://www.mghcareers.org

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 19,915
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adaptive-engineering-lab-inc-.jpeg
Adaptive Engineering Lab (AEL)
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massachusetts-general-hospital.jpeg
Massachusetts General Hospital
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Adaptive Engineering Lab (AEL)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Massachusetts General Hospital
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Adaptive Engineering Lab (AEL) in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Massachusetts General Hospital in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Adaptive Engineering Lab (AEL) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Adaptive Engineering Lab (AEL) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Massachusetts General Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Massachusetts General Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adaptive-engineering-lab-inc-.jpeg
Adaptive Engineering Lab (AEL)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/massachusetts-general-hospital.jpeg
Massachusetts General Hospital
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Massachusetts General Hospital company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Adaptive Engineering Lab (AEL) company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Massachusetts General Hospital company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Adaptive Engineering Lab (AEL) company has not reported any.

In the current year, Massachusetts General Hospital company and Adaptive Engineering Lab (AEL) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Massachusetts General Hospital company nor Adaptive Engineering Lab (AEL) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Massachusetts General Hospital company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Adaptive Engineering Lab (AEL) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Massachusetts General Hospital company nor Adaptive Engineering Lab (AEL) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Adaptive Engineering Lab (AEL) company nor Massachusetts General Hospital company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Massachusetts General Hospital company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Adaptive Engineering Lab (AEL) company.

Massachusetts General Hospital company employs more people globally than Adaptive Engineering Lab (AEL) company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X