Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Activision BlizzardActivision Blizzard
VS
Dave & Buster's Inc.Dave & Buster's Inc.
Activision Blizzard

Activision Blizzard

3100 Ocean Park Boulevard, Santa Monica, California, US, 90405

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
748/1000Moderate

Activision Blizzard, Inc. is one of the world’s largest interactive entertainment companies, with operations across North America, Europe, and Asia. We are home to some of the most beloved entertainment franchises including Call of Duty®, Skylanders®, World of Warcraft®...

NAICS:71
NAICS Definition:Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees:1,418
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Dave & Buster's Inc.

Dave & Buster's Inc.

1221 S Belt Line Rd, Coppell, Texas, 75019, US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
781/1000Fair

Welcome to Dave & Buster's, the ONLY place to Eat, Drink, Play & Watch Sports®, all under one roof! Here, you can immerse yourself in a world of excitement, from our Million Dollar Midway, packed with the hottest arcade games, to our mouth-watering, chef-crafted creatio...

NAICS:71
NAICS Definition:Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees:11,556
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Activision Blizzard

Activision Blizzard

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Dave & Buster's Inc.

Dave & Buster's Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Activision Blizzard in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dave & Buster's Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Activision Blizzard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Activision Blizzard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Dave & Buster's Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dave & Buster's Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Activision Blizzard

Activision Blizzard

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ACT1262112102725
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ACT225921122
Dave & Buster's Inc.

Dave & Buster's Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Activision Blizzard company and Dave & Buster's Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Activision Blizzard company and Dave & Buster's Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Activision Blizzard company and Dave & Buster's Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Activision Blizzard company and Dave & Buster's Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Activision Blizzard company and Dave & Buster's Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Activision Blizzard company and Dave & Buster's Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Activision Blizzard company and Dave & Buster's Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Activision Blizzard company and Dave & Buster's Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Activision Blizzard company and Dave & Buster's Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Activision Blizzard company and Dave & Buster's Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Activision Blizzard company and Dave & Buster's Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Activision Blizzard and Dave & Buster's Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Activision Blizzard and Dave & Buster's Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Activision Blizzard or Dave & Buster's Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Activision Blizzard or Dave & Buster's Inc. ?
Between Activision Blizzard and Dave & Buster's Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Activision Blizzard and Dave & Buster's Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2