Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ActemiumActemium
VS
Schneider ElectricSchneider Electric
Actemium

Actemium

N/A

Last Update: 11/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.actemium.com
761/1000Fair

Actemium is the industry brand of VINCI Energies. Focusing on a continuous optimization of industrial performance, Actemium accompanies customers in a smooth way into the new industrial era. The network, comprising with 400 agile & self-learning Business Units speciali...

NAICS:33325
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:5,925
Subsidiaries:67
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Schneider Electric

Schneider Electric

35 Rue Joseph Monier, Rueil Malmaison, 92506, FR

Last Update: 02/08/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.se.com/
613/1000Poor

Schneider Electric is a global energy technology leader, driving efficiency and sustainability by electrifying, automating, and digitalizing industries, businesses, and homes. Its technologies enable buildings, data centers, factories, infrastructure, and grids to ope...

NAICS:33325
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:88,380
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Actemium

Actemium

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Schneider Electric

Schneider Electric

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Actemium in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Schneider Electric has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Actemium (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Actemium cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Schneider Electric (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schneider Electric cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Actemium

Actemium

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Schneider Electric

Schneider Electric

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SCHMAPSOUSIEROC1785680820
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
KORKORSCH1767123879
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SCH836032125

FAQ

Between Actemium company and Schneider Electric company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Actemium company and Schneider Electric company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Actemium company and Schneider Electric company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Actemium company and Schneider Electric company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Actemium company and Schneider Electric company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Actemium company and Schneider Electric company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Actemium company and Schneider Electric company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Actemium company and Schneider Electric company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Actemium company and Schneider Electric company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Actemium company and Schneider Electric company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Actemium company and Schneider Electric company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Actemium and Schneider Electric, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Actemium and Schneider Electric, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Actemium or Schneider Electric ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Actemium or Schneider Electric ?
Between Actemium and Schneider Electric, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Actemium and Schneider Electric, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA