Comparison Overview
Acrisure Protection Group

Acrisure Protection Group
8659 Research Dr, Irvine, 92618, US
Last Update: 23/07/2026
Acrisure Protection Group, formally Southwest Dealer Services offers dealer clients the industry leading F&I voluntary protection products, reinsurance/dealer participation programs, anti-theft programs, and dealer-centric P&C/worker comp offerings. We boast a national ...

Volvo Trucks
Herkulesgatan 75, Gothenburg, 405 08, SE
Last Update: 20/09/2026
Volvo Trucks supplies complete transport solutions for discerning professional customers with its full range of medium- and heavy-duty trucks. Customer support is provided via a global network of dealers with 2,200 service points in about 130 countries. Volvo trucks are...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Acrisure Protection Group







Volvo Trucks






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Acrisure Protection Group has 56.9% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Volvo Trucks in 2026.
Incident History - Acrisure Protection Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Acrisure Protection Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Volvo Trucks (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Volvo Trucks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Acrisure Protection Group

Volvo Trucks
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.