Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Acosta PetAcosta Pet
VS
CoppelCoppel
Acosta Pet

Acosta Pet

16841 N. 31st Ave, Phoenix, AZ, 85053, US

Last Update: 05/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://acosta.com/
755/1000Fair

We are pet product experts! We are a one-stop shop for all your pet service needs. Our experience with major retailers gives us and our partners a competitive edge.

NAICS:452
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:119
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Coppel

Coppel

República 2855 pte, Recursos Hidráulicos, Culiacan, Sinaloa, MX, 80105

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.coppel.com
804/1000Good

Coppel es una empresa mexicana con sede en la ciudad de Culiacán, que ha sido fundada en 1941. Es una cadena comercial de tiendas departamentales de ventas a través del otorgamiento de créditos con pocos requisitos, y repartos gratuitos. En la actualidad cuenta con mas ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:30,834
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Acosta Pet

Acosta Pet

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Coppel

Coppel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Acosta Pet in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coppel in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Acosta Pet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Acosta Pet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Coppel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coppel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Acosta Pet

Acosta Pet

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Coppel

Coppel

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Acosta Pet company and Coppel company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Acosta Pet company and Coppel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Acosta Pet company and Coppel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Acosta Pet company and Coppel company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Acosta Pet company and Coppel company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Acosta Pet company and Coppel company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Acosta Pet company and Coppel company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Acosta Pet company and Coppel company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Acosta Pet company and Coppel company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Acosta Pet company and Coppel company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Acosta Pet company and Coppel company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Acosta Pet and Coppel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Acosta Pet and Coppel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Acosta Pet or Coppel ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Acosta Pet or Coppel ?
Between Acosta Pet and Coppel, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Acosta Pet and Coppel, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3