Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Acosta PetAcosta Pet
VS
Best BuyBest Buy
Acosta Pet

Acosta Pet

16841 N. 31st Ave, Phoenix, AZ, 85053, US

Last Update: 05/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://acosta.com/
755/1000Fair

We are pet product experts! We are a one-stop shop for all your pet service needs. Our experience with major retailers gives us and our partners a competitive edge.

NAICS:452
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:119
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Best Buy

Best Buy

7601 Penn Ave South, Richfield, 55423-3645, US

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://jobs.bestbuy.com
779/1000Fair

At Best Buy, our purpose is to enrich lives through technology. We do that by leveraging our unique combination of tech expertise and human touch to meet our customers’ everyday needs, whether they come to us online, visit our stores or invite us into their homes. With ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:76,352
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Acosta Pet

Acosta Pet

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Best Buy

Best Buy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Acosta Pet in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

Best Buy has 1.96% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Acosta Pet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Acosta Pet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Best Buy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Best Buy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Acosta Pet

Acosta Pet

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Best Buy

Best Buy

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BES1769526220
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BES912080425

FAQ

Between Acosta Pet company and Best Buy company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Acosta Pet company and Best Buy company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Acosta Pet company and Best Buy company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Acosta Pet company and Best Buy company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Acosta Pet company and Best Buy company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Acosta Pet company and Best Buy company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Acosta Pet company and Best Buy company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Acosta Pet company and Best Buy company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Acosta Pet company and Best Buy company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Acosta Pet company and Best Buy company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Acosta Pet company and Best Buy company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Acosta Pet and Best Buy, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Acosta Pet and Best Buy, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Acosta Pet or Best Buy ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Acosta Pet or Best Buy ?
Between Acosta Pet and Best Buy, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Acosta Pet and Best Buy, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3