Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Acme Truck Line, Inc.Acme Truck Line, Inc.
VS
UPSUPS
Acme Truck Line, Inc.

Acme Truck Line, Inc.

N/A

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.acmetruck.com
648/1000Poor

Since 1960 ACME TRUCK LINE has been a leader in the transportation of equipment, materials, and supplies throughout the United States. ACME is the largest oilfield carrier in America. This is a 100% owner/operator fleet comprised of over 2,000 trucks. ACME offers expe...

NAICS:484
NAICS Definition:Truck Transportation
Employees:594
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
UPS

UPS

55 Glenlake Parkway, NE, Atlanta, GA, US, 30328

Last Update: 18/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://about.ups.com/
812/1000Good

Operating in more than 200 countries and territories, we’re committed to moving our world forward by delivering what matters. Beginning as a small messenger service, UPS was started by two enterprising teenagers and a $100 loan. Now, we’re almost 500,000 UPSers strong, ...

NAICS:484
NAICS Definition:Truck Transportation
Employees:172,902
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Acme Truck Line, Inc.

Acme Truck Line, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UPS

UPS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

Acme Truck Line, Inc. has 53.92% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UPS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Acme Truck Line, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Acme Truck Line, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UPS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UPS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Acme Truck Line, Inc.

Acme Truck Line, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ACM1774889065
UPS

UPS

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
UPS134025623

FAQ

Between Acme Truck Line, Inc. company and UPS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Acme Truck Line, Inc. company and UPS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Acme Truck Line, Inc. company and UPS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Acme Truck Line, Inc. company and UPS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Acme Truck Line, Inc. company and UPS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Acme Truck Line, Inc. company and UPS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Acme Truck Line, Inc. company and UPS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Acme Truck Line, Inc. company and UPS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Acme Truck Line, Inc. company and UPS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Acme Truck Line, Inc. company and UPS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Acme Truck Line, Inc. company and UPS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Acme Truck Line, Inc. and UPS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Acme Truck Line, Inc. and UPS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Acme Truck Line, Inc. or UPS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Acme Truck Line, Inc. or UPS ?
Between Acme Truck Line, Inc. and UPS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Acme Truck Line, Inc. and UPS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8