Acma-spa vs Kukaglobal - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Comparison Overview

ACMA, a Coesia company

KUKA

ACMA, a Coesia company

Via Cristoforo Colombo, 1, (Bologna), IT, 40131

Last Update: 26/12/2025

View Profile

Between 700 and 749

http://www.acma.it

746/1000Moderate

ACMA, a Coesia Company, is a leading provider of advanced packaging technologies for the Food and Home & Personal Care industries, with over 100 years of history in engineering excellence and innovation. The company designs and delivers both stand-alone machines and ful...

NAICS:33325

NAICS Definition:Others

Employees:256

Subsidiaries:24

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

KUKA

Zugspitzstr. 140, Augsburg, 86165, DE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

http://www.kuka.com

781/1000Fair

KUKA SE & Co. KGaA is a global leader in intelligent automation solutions, generating around 3.7 billion euro in sales and employing approximately 15,000 people worldwide. Headquartered in Augsburg, Germany, KUKA’s mission is to make automation accessible for everyone -...

NAICS:33325

NAICS Definition:Others

Employees:10,671

Subsidiaries:6

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category

ACMA, a Coesia company

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

KUKA

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ACMA, a Coesia company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KUKA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ACMA, a Coesia company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ACMA, a Coesia company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Incident History - KUKA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KUKA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...

ACMA, a Coesia company

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

KUKA

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ACMA, a Coesia company company and KUKA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between ACMA, a Coesia company company and KUKA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between ACMA, a Coesia company company and KUKA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between ACMA, a Coesia company company and KUKA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between ACMA, a Coesia company company and KUKA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between ACMA, a Coesia company company and KUKA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between ACMA, a Coesia company company and KUKA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between ACMA, a Coesia company company and KUKA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between ACMA, a Coesia company company and KUKA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between ACMA, a Coesia company company and KUKA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between ACMA, a Coesia company company and KUKA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between ACMA, a Coesia company and KUKA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between ACMA, a Coesia company and KUKA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ACMA, a Coesia company or KUKA ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ACMA, a Coesia company or KUKA ?

Between ACMA, a Coesia company and KUKA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between ACMA, a Coesia company and KUKA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-76929

SUMMARY

Pcapng file parser crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.7)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76928

SUMMARY

X.509IF protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76927

SUMMARY

H.245 protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.7)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76926

SUMMARY

BUSMASTER file parser abnormal exit in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.1)

CVSS3

Base Score: 3.1

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

1.4

EXPLOITABILITY

1.6

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76924

SUMMARY

Kerberos protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)

CVSS3

Base Score: 5.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

1.8

REFERENCES