Comparison Overview
ACMA, a Coesia company

ACMA, a Coesia company
Via Cristoforo Colombo, 1, (Bologna), IT, 40131
Last Update: 26/12/2025
ACMA, a Coesia Company, is a leading provider of advanced packaging technologies for the Food and Home & Personal Care industries, with over 100 years of history in engineering excellence and innovation. The company designs and delivers both stand-alone machines and ful...

ABB
Affolternstrasse 44, Zurich, 8050, CH
Last Update: 10/09/2026
ABB is a technology leader in electrification and automation, enabling a more sustainable and resource-efficient future. The company’s solutions connect engineering know-how and software to optimize how things are manufactured, moved, powered and operated. Building on o...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

ACMA, a Coesia company







ABB






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ACMA, a Coesia company in 2026.
Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ABB in 2026.
Incident History - ACMA, a Coesia company (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ACMA, a Coesia company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - ABB (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ABB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

ACMA, a Coesia company

ABB
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Coder before 2.34.7 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the ExtractRealIPAddress middleware that trusts the leftmost, client-supplied X-Forwarded-For value instead of the client IP appended by a reverse proxy. Attackers can send forged X-Forwarded-For values through appending proxies to bypass per-IP rate limits on login, one-time passcode, and password validation endpoints, enabling brute-force attacks, and to falsify IP addresses recorded in audit logs.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a user enumeration vulnerability because userpassword.Compare() substitutes a placeholder hash derived from the string "hunter2" when a stored password hash is empty. Unauthenticated attackers can submit logins with the password "hunter2" and distinguish HTTP 403 from 401 responses to enumerate valid accounts and reveal the authentication provider of SSO-only users.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a stored HTML injection vulnerability because the ApplicationName and LogoURL appearance settings are rendered into HTML output without sufficient escaping. Attackers with the Owner role can store HTML markup in these settings that renders in the Coder dashboard and in SMTP notification emails sent to other deployment users.
Coder from 2.0.0 before 2.34.8 contains an open redirect vulnerability in handleAPIKeySmuggling that allows attackers to redirect users externally via unsanitized r.URL.Path values. Attackers can craft links on trusted workspace app subdomains with paths beginning with double slashes, which become scheme-relative redirects to attacker sites for phishing.