Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ACL LaboratoriesACL Laboratories
VS
GE HealthCareGE HealthCare
ACL Laboratories

ACL Laboratories

8901 W Lincoln Ave, West Allis, WI, 53227, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
764/1000Fair

ACL is a clinical laboratory supporting the inpatient and outpatient needs of 27 hospitals and medical groups within Advocate Aurora Health now Advocate Health. In addition, we service over 2,000 outreach clients, including clinics, physician offices, local hospitals a...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:432
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
GE HealthCare

GE HealthCare

-, Chicago, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.gehealthcare.com
812/1000Good

Every day millions of people feel the impact of our intelligent devices, advanced analytics and artificial intelligence. As a leading global medical technology and digital solutions innovator, GE HealthCare enables clinicians to make faster, more informed decisions thro...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:59,503
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ACL Laboratories

ACL Laboratories

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GE HealthCare

GE HealthCare

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ACL Laboratories in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GE HealthCare in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ACL Laboratories (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ACL Laboratories cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GE HealthCare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GE HealthCare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ACL Laboratories

ACL Laboratories

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
GE HealthCare

GE HealthCare

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ACL Laboratories company and GE HealthCare company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ACL Laboratories company and GE HealthCare company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ACL Laboratories company and GE HealthCare company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ACL Laboratories company and GE HealthCare company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ACL Laboratories company and GE HealthCare company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ACL Laboratories company and GE HealthCare company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ACL Laboratories company and GE HealthCare company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ACL Laboratories company and GE HealthCare company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ACL Laboratories company and GE HealthCare company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ACL Laboratories company and GE HealthCare company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ACL Laboratories company and GE HealthCare company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ACL Laboratories and GE HealthCare, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ACL Laboratories and GE HealthCare, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ACL Laboratories or GE HealthCare ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ACL Laboratories or GE HealthCare ?
Between ACL Laboratories and GE HealthCare, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ACL Laboratories and GE HealthCare, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2