Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ACI Logistics LimitedACI Logistics Limited
VS
Wegmans Food MarketsWegmans Food Markets
ACI Logistics Limited

ACI Logistics Limited

Tejgaon I/A, Dhaka, 1208, BD

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.shwapno.com
688/1000Weak

Shwapno is the largest retail chain in Bangladesh, operating 834 stores across 64 districts. With a 55% market share in the modern trade sector, Shwapno serves over 1,00,000+ customers daily, delivering quality products and a superior shopping experience.

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:1,587
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Wegmans Food Markets

Wegmans Food Markets

1500 Brooks Ave, Rochester, 14603-0844, US

Last Update: 06/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://jobs.wegmans.com/
742/1000Moderate

Wegmans Food Markets is a family-owned regional supermarket chain and one of the largest private companies in the US. Recognized as an industry leader and innovator, the company was founded in 1916 and employs over 53,000 people. Wegmans has been named one of the “100 B...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:21,737
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ACI Logistics Limited

ACI Logistics Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Wegmans Food Markets

Wegmans Food Markets

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ACI Logistics Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wegmans Food Markets in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ACI Logistics Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ACI Logistics Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Wegmans Food Markets (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wegmans Food Markets cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ACI Logistics Limited

ACI Logistics Limited

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ACI1774708213
Wegmans Food Markets

Wegmans Food Markets

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TARWEG1777381148
🔒 Incident : Breach
WEGTAR1778027645

FAQ

Between ACI Logistics Limited company and Wegmans Food Markets company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ACI Logistics Limited company and Wegmans Food Markets company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ACI Logistics Limited company and Wegmans Food Markets company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ACI Logistics Limited company and Wegmans Food Markets company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ACI Logistics Limited company and Wegmans Food Markets company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ACI Logistics Limited company and Wegmans Food Markets company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ACI Logistics Limited company and Wegmans Food Markets company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ACI Logistics Limited company and Wegmans Food Markets company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ACI Logistics Limited company and Wegmans Food Markets company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ACI Logistics Limited company and Wegmans Food Markets company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ACI Logistics Limited company and Wegmans Food Markets company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ACI Logistics Limited and Wegmans Food Markets, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ACI Logistics Limited and Wegmans Food Markets, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ACI Logistics Limited or Wegmans Food Markets ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ACI Logistics Limited or Wegmans Food Markets ?
Between ACI Logistics Limited and Wegmans Food Markets, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ACI Logistics Limited and Wegmans Food Markets, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-58281
SUMMARY

Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-10660
SUMMARY

The Bluetooth BAP Broadcast Assistant GATT client in subsys/bluetooth/audio/bap_broadcast_assistant.c reassembled remote Broadcast Receive State data into a single file-static net_buf_simple (att_buf, BT_ATT_MAX_ATTRIBUTE_LEN = 512 bytes) shared by all connection instances, while the BUSY flag, long-read handle, and reset/offset state were per-connection. When the device acts as a Broadcast Assistant connected to multiple Scan Delegator peripherals, notification and long-read callbacks from different connections interleave on the shared buffer: the append in notify_handler (net_buf_simple_add_mem at the not-busy branch) performs no tailroom check, so receive-state notifications from two or more delegators accumulate on the same 512-byte buffer and, with a sufficiently large configured ATT MTU (BT_L2CAP_TX_MTU up to 2000) and two-to-three concurrent connections, write past the buffer into adjacent .bss (net_buf_simple_add only asserts in debug builds). Even below the overflow threshold, one connection's net_buf_simple_reset zeroes the shared length while another connection's reassembly and GATT read offset are in flight, mixing one peer's data into another's parse. A malicious or compromised Scan Delegator (or two colluding peers) over BLE can trigger this, causing out-of-bounds writes (memory corruption / denial of service) and cross-connection data corruption. The fix moves the buffer into the per-connection instance struct so each connection reassembles into its own buffer. Affects Zephyr releases shipping the Broadcast Assistant with the shared buffer, including v4.4.0 and earlier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-61870
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the VIFF encoder when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger allocation failures by processing specially crafted VIFF images to exhaust available memory and cause denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 2.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.4
CVE-2026-61861
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in the FormatMagickCaption method when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger memory allocation failures to cause a dangling pointer to reference freed memory, potentially enabling denial of service or code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-61858
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in the APNG encoder and external delegates due to missing validation checks. Attackers can write files to disallowed paths by bypassing configured policy restrictions through the APNG encoding process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8