Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Acer MedicalAcer Medical
VS
AlconAlcon
Acer Medical

Acer Medical

7F, No. 86, Sec. 1, Xintai 5th Rd. Xizhi Dist., None, New Taipei City, None, TW, 221

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
757/1000Fair

A subsidiary of the Acer Group, Acer Medical connects all partners from the entire medical care value chain - from clinical research to product development, to implementation and expert service support. At Acer Medical, we help unlock the healthcare industry’s full po...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:24
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Alcon

Alcon

Avenue Louis-Casaï 58, Geneva, Switzerland, CH, 1216

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.alcon.com
792/1000Fair

Alcon helps people see brilliantly. As the global leader in eye care with a heritage spanning over 75 years, we offer the broadest portfolio of products to enhance sight and improve people’s lives. Our Surgical and Vision Care products touch the lives of more than 260 m...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:27,040
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Acer Medical

Acer Medical

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Alcon

Alcon

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Acer Medical in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alcon in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Acer Medical (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Acer Medical cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Alcon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alcon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Acer Medical

Acer Medical

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Alcon

Alcon

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ALC532072725

FAQ

Between Acer Medical company and Alcon company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Acer Medical company and Alcon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Acer Medical company and Alcon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Acer Medical company and Alcon company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Acer Medical company and Alcon company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Acer Medical company and Alcon company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Acer Medical company and Alcon company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Acer Medical company and Alcon company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Acer Medical company and Alcon company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Acer Medical company and Alcon company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Acer Medical company and Alcon company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Acer Medical and Alcon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Acer Medical and Alcon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Acer Medical or Alcon ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Acer Medical or Alcon ?
Between Acer Medical and Alcon, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Acer Medical and Alcon, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA