Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ace Doran Hauling & RiggingAce Doran Hauling & Rigging
VS
Swift TransportationSwift Transportation
Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging

Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging

1601 Blue Rock St, Cincinnati, 45223, US

Last Update: 01/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.acedoran.com
756/1000Fair

Ace Doran is a 100% owner/operator open-deck carrier providing a century of specialized service to our valued customers. Our services include flatbed, step-deck, heavy haul, government, steel hauling, and industrial machinery transport. We have over 100 years of experie...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:129
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Swift Transportation

Swift Transportation

2200 S. 75th Ave, Phoenix, 85043, US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.swifttrans.com
773/1000Fair

Swift Transportation is the largest full-truckload motor carrier in North America. Based in Phoenix, Arizona, the Swift terminal network includes over thirty full-service facilities in the United States and Mexico. Swift provides a full line of service solutions, includ...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:10,756
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging

Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Swift Transportation

Swift Transportation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation/Trucking/Railroad Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation/Trucking/Railroad Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swift Transportation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Swift Transportation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swift Transportation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging

Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Swift Transportation

Swift Transportation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging company and Swift Transportation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging company and Swift Transportation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging company and Swift Transportation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging company and Swift Transportation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging company and Swift Transportation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging company and Swift Transportation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging company and Swift Transportation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging company and Swift Transportation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging company and Swift Transportation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging company and Swift Transportation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging company and Swift Transportation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging and Swift Transportation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging and Swift Transportation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging or Swift Transportation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging or Swift Transportation ?
Between Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging and Swift Transportation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ace Doran Hauling & Rigging and Swift Transportation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2