Comparison Overview
Accenture Brasil

Accenture Brasil
Avenida Das Nacoes Unidas 14401, Torre Paineira, 11-12-13º andares - Complexo Parque da Cidade. Chácara Santo Antônio, São Paulo, SP, BR, 04794-000
Last Update: 04/04/2026
A Accenture é uma empresa líder global de serviços profissionais que ajuda grandes companhias, governos e outras organizações a construir sua essência digital, otimizar suas operações, acelerar o crescimento das receitas e aprimorar serviços ao cidadão – criando valor t...

Dimension Data
The Campus, 57 Sloane Street Cnr Sloane Street and Main Road, Bryanston, 2021, ZA
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Dimension Data is a leading African born technology provider operating in the Middle East and Africa, offering a portfolio of services including systems integration, managed services infrastructure, cloud solutions, business applications, customer experience, and intell...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Accenture Brasil







Dimension Data






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Accenture Brasil in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Dimension Data in 2026.
Incident History - Accenture Brasil (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Accenture Brasil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Dimension Data (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Dimension Data cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Accenture Brasil

Dimension Data
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.