Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Accenture DACHAccenture DACH
VS
NTT DATA North AmericaNTT DATA North America
Accenture DACH

Accenture DACH

Campus Kronberg 1, Kronberg im Taunus, 61476, DE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.accenture.de
765/1000Fair

Über Accenture: Wir sind die weltweit führenden Berater für Strategie, Management, Digitalisierung, Technologie, Outsourcing und Business Transformation. Accenture bietet End-to-End-Lösungen – von der Strategie-Entwicklung über die Digitale Transformation bis hin zur o...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:4,109
Subsidiaries:33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
NTT DATA North America

NTT DATA North America

7950 Legacy Drive, Plano, 75024, US

Last Update: 06/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://us.nttdata.com/en/
794/1000Fair

NTT DATA, Inc. is a trusted global innovator of business and technology services. We're committed to helping clients innovate, optimize and transform for long-term success. Our R&D investments help organizations and society move confidently and sustainably into the digi...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:24,933
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Accenture DACH

Accenture DACH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NTT DATA North America

NTT DATA North America

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Accenture DACH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NTT DATA North America in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Accenture DACH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Accenture DACH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NTT DATA North America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NTT DATA North America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Accenture DACH

Accenture DACH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
NTT DATA North America

NTT DATA North America

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Accenture DACH company and NTT DATA North America company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Accenture DACH company and NTT DATA North America company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Accenture DACH company and NTT DATA North America company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Accenture DACH company and NTT DATA North America company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Accenture DACH company and NTT DATA North America company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Accenture DACH company and NTT DATA North America company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Accenture DACH company and NTT DATA North America company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Accenture DACH company and NTT DATA North America company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Accenture DACH company and NTT DATA North America company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Accenture DACH company and NTT DATA North America company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Accenture DACH company and NTT DATA North America company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Accenture DACH and NTT DATA North America, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Accenture DACH and NTT DATA North America, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Accenture DACH or NTT DATA North America ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Accenture DACH or NTT DATA North America ?
Between Accenture DACH and NTT DATA North America, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Accenture DACH and NTT DATA North America, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9