Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Accenture BalticsAccenture Baltics
VS
USTUST
Accenture Baltics

Accenture Baltics

Brīvības iela 214, Riga, undefined, undefined, LV

Last Update: 24/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.accenture.com
756/1000Fair

Accenture is a global professional services company with leading capabilities in digital, cloud, and security. Combining unmatched experience and specialized skills across more than 40 industries, we offer Strategy and Consulting, Technology and Operations Services, and...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:1,178
Subsidiaries:33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UST

UST

5 Polaris Way, Aliso Viejo, CA, US, 92656

Last Update: 03/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.ust.com
810/1000Good

UST is a global digital transformation solutions provider. For more than 20 years, UST has worked side by side with the world’s best companies to make a real impact through transformation. Powered by technology, inspired by people and led by purpose, UST partners with...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:39,758
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Accenture Baltics

Accenture Baltics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UST

UST

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Accenture Baltics in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UST in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Accenture Baltics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Accenture Baltics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UST (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UST cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Accenture Baltics

Accenture Baltics

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UST

UST

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Accenture Baltics company and UST company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Accenture Baltics company and UST company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Accenture Baltics company and UST company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Accenture Baltics company and UST company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Accenture Baltics company and UST company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Accenture Baltics company and UST company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Accenture Baltics company and UST company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Accenture Baltics company and UST company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Accenture Baltics company and UST company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Accenture Baltics company and UST company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Accenture Baltics company and UST company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Accenture Baltics and UST, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Accenture Baltics and UST, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Accenture Baltics or UST ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Accenture Baltics or UST ?
Between Accenture Baltics and UST, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Accenture Baltics and UST, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
REFERENCES