Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Accélérateur 51Accélérateur 51
VS
Region MidtjyllandRegion Midtjylland
Accélérateur 51

Accélérateur 51

Paris, FR

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile

Inspiré des dispositifs d’innovation type Lab, l’Accélérateur 51 a pour objectif d’accompagner le développement d’expérimentations de projets de santé innovants s’inscrivant dans le dispositif Article 51. Déployé depuis mars 2019, l’Accélérateur 51 propose un accompagn...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:111
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Region Midtjylland

Region Midtjylland

Skottenborg 26, Viborg, 8800, DK

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
779/1000Fair

Central Denmark Region is one of five regions in Denmark. Denmark is organised at three political and administrative levels: the national (government), the regional (5 regions) and the municipal level (98 municipalities). Each region is led by a Regional Council, co...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:14,924
Subsidiaries:49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Accélérateur 51

Accélérateur 51

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Region Midtjylland

Region Midtjylland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Accélérateur 51 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Region Midtjylland in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Accélérateur 51 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Accélérateur 51 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Region Midtjylland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Region Midtjylland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Accélérateur 51

Accélérateur 51

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Region Midtjylland

Region Midtjylland

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Accélérateur 51 company and Region Midtjylland company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Accélérateur 51 company and Region Midtjylland company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Accélérateur 51 company and Region Midtjylland company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Accélérateur 51 company and Region Midtjylland company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Accélérateur 51 company and Region Midtjylland company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Accélérateur 51 company and Region Midtjylland company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Accélérateur 51 company and Region Midtjylland company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Accélérateur 51 company and Region Midtjylland company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Accélérateur 51 company and Region Midtjylland company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Accélérateur 51 company and Region Midtjylland company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Accélérateur 51 company and Region Midtjylland company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Accélérateur 51 and Region Midtjylland, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Accélérateur 51 and Region Midtjylland, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Accélérateur 51 or Region Midtjylland ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Accélérateur 51 or Region Midtjylland ?
Between Accélérateur 51 and Region Midtjylland, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Accélérateur 51 and Region Midtjylland, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66339
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. After a CONNECT tunnel is established through an HTTP proxy, libsoup incorrectly attaches the Proxy-Authorization header to subsequent HTTPS requests sent through that tunnel to the destination server. This allows the destination server to capture proxy credentials, leading to information disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66338
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. The chunked transfer encoding parser uses a permissive parsing function for chunk sizes that silently accepts inputs violating RFC 9112, including leading whitespace, plus sign prefixes, and trailing invalid characters. When libsoup operates behind a strict frontend proxy, this parsing differential can be exploited to smuggle HTTP requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-66337
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. An unsigned integer underflow in the soup_filter_input_stream_read_until() function causes a heap buffer over-read when parsing multipart HTTP responses. A malicious HTTP server can exploit this by sending a crafted multipart response, potentially causing the client application to crash or disclose sensitive heap memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-61892
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI allows a non-privileged user to modify tokens to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-61886
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI stores user account passwords in plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8