Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ACCA ChinaACCA China
VS
MazarsMazars
ACCA China

ACCA China

Room 2929 Shanghai Central Plaza, 200020, CN

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://cn.accaglobal.com
809/1000Good

ACCA(特许公认会计师公会)是全球广受认可的国际专业会计师组织,为全世界有志投身于财会、金融以及管理领域的专才提供首选的资格认证。ACCA目前在大中华区拥有28,000名会员及167,000名学员和准会员,并在北京、上海、广州、深圳、成都、沈阳、青岛、武汉、长沙、香港和澳门共设有11个办公室。

NAICS:5412
NAICS Definition:Accounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll Services
Employees:29
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Mazars

Mazars

Tour Exaltis, Paris La Defense, 92075, FR

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.mazars.com
840/1000Good

Mazars is an internationally integrated partnership, specialising in audit, accountancy, advisory, tax and legal services*. Operating in over 100 countries and territories around the world, we draw on the expertise of more than 50,000 professionals – 33,000+ in Mazars’ ...

NAICS:5412
NAICS Definition:Accounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll Services
Employees:13,471
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ACCA China

ACCA China

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mazars

Mazars

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Accounting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ACCA China in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Accounting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mazars in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ACCA China (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ACCA China cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mazars (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mazars cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ACCA China

ACCA China

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Mazars

Mazars

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ACCA China company and Mazars company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ACCA China company and Mazars company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ACCA China company and Mazars company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ACCA China company and Mazars company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ACCA China company and Mazars company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ACCA China company and Mazars company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ACCA China company and Mazars company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ACCA China company and Mazars company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ACCA China company and Mazars company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ACCA China company and Mazars company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ACCA China company and Mazars company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ACCA China and Mazars, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ACCA China and Mazars, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ACCA China or Mazars ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ACCA China or Mazars ?
Between ACCA China and Mazars, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ACCA China and Mazars, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA