Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF)Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF)
VS
SanlamSanlam
Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF)

Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF)

One India Bulls Centre, Tower I, 17th Floor,, Mumbai, 400013, IN

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
763/1000Fair

Welcome to the official page of Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund. Here, you can get regular updates on: 1- New fund launches 2 - Dividend declarations 3 - FAQs 4 - Educational information on Mutual Funds, investments and financial management 5 - Get resolution for your...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:1,828
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sanlam

Sanlam

ZA

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sanlam.co.za
784/1000Fair

We’ve finally given a name to that special something a person exudes when they have a plan for their finances. It’s called The F Factor – and now that you know its name, it’s time you feel it too. Let's unlock your financial confidence, together.​ Our team is online we...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:19,623
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF)

Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sanlam

Sanlam

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sanlam in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sanlam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sanlam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF)

Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sanlam

Sanlam

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF) company and Sanlam company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF) company and Sanlam company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF) company and Sanlam company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF) company and Sanlam company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF) company and Sanlam company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF) company and Sanlam company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF) company and Sanlam company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF) company and Sanlam company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF) company and Sanlam company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF) company and Sanlam company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF) company and Sanlam company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF) and Sanlam, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF) and Sanlam, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF) or Sanlam ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF) or Sanlam ?
Between Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF) and Sanlam, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund (ABSLMF) and Sanlam, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96795
SUMMARY

Horilla is an HR and CRM software. Prior to 2.0.0, HorillaListView.export_data in horilla_views/generic/cbv/views.py accepts an authenticated user's columns POST parameter, takes field_tuple[1], interpolates it into dynamic_fn_str as Python source, and passes the generated function definition to exec(). A crafted string that remains valid under ast.literal_eval can inject Python syntax into a default argument evaluated during function definition, allowing arbitrary operating-system commands to execute with the application process privileges, including root privileges in the shipped Docker image. This issue is fixed in version 2.0.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-25
UPDATED
Date2026-09-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86066
SUMMARY

Horilla is an HR and CRM software. Prior to 2.0.0, approve_validate_attendance_request at /attendance/approve-validate-attendance-request/ changes attendance_validated, is_validate_request_approved, approved_by, and related pending-request state through an HTTP GET before calling attendance.save(), so Django does not require CSRF validation for the action. An unauthenticated attacker can cause a logged-in manager with attendance.change_attendance to make a top-level request that carries the manager's SameSite=Lax session cookie, silently approving attendance with the victim's privileges and attributing the approval to the victim in the audit trail. This issue is fixed in version 2.0.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-25
UPDATED
Date2026-09-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-57449
SUMMARY

Actual is a local-first personal finance tool. Prior to 26.7.0, Actual Sync Server's CORS proxy is intended to let authenticated users fetch resources only from repositories listed in the official plugin allowlist. When `ACTUAL_GITHUB_TOKEN` is configured, the proxy automatically attaches the server's GitHub token to GitHub requests. The GitHub API allowlist check uses a raw `startsWith()` prefix test for `/repos/{owner}/{repo}` without requiring a path boundary after the repository name. If an allowlisted public plugin repository is `https://github.com/acme/plugin`, the proxy also accepts GitHub API URLs. Those URLs are outside the allowlisted repository but still pass because their API path starts with `/repos/acme/plugin`. The proxy then forwards the request with the server's `ACTUAL_GITHUB_TOKEN`, allowing any authenticated Actual user to read private GitHub resources reachable by that token. Version 26.7.0 fixes the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-25
UPDATED
Date2026-09-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-92842
SUMMARY

The convert.base64-encode, convert.quoted-printable-encode and convert.quoted-printable-decode stream filters accept a line-break-chars option whose length is tracked separately from the string itself. The filter constructors duplicate the value with pestrdup(), which stops at the first NUL byte, while keeping the original length. When the filter later emits a line break it copies the recorded length out of the truncated allocation, reading past its end and placing adjacent heap bytes into the filter output.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-25
UPDATED
Date2026-09-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-91768
SUMMARY

The IPv6 branch of the FastCGI client access check compares only the first 12 bytes of a 16-byte IPv6 address, so listen.allowed_clients matches on a /96 prefix instead of the exact address. An attacker who can source an address sharing the first 96 bits with an allowed one passes the check and reaches the FastCGI endpoint.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-25
UPDATED
Date2026-09-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8