Comparison Overview
AACN (American Association of Critical-Care Nurses)

AACN (American Association of Critical-Care Nurses)
27071 Aliso Creek Road, Aliso Viejo, 92656, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
AACN is the largest specialty nursing organization in the world, representing the interests of more than 500,000 nurses who are charged with the responsibility of caring for acutely and critically ill patients. The association is dedicated to providing our members with ...

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica
Av. Paulista 867, São Paulo, 01311-100, BR
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Com cerca de 80 anos de experiência, a Hapvida é hoje a maior empresa de saúde integrada da América Latina. A companhia, que possui mais de 69 mil colaboradores, atende quase 16 milhões de beneficiários de saúde e odontologia espalhados pelas cinco regiões do Brasil. T...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

AACN (American Association of Critical-Care Nurses)







Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for AACN (American Association of Critical-Care Nurses) in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica in 2026.
Incident History - AACN (American Association of Critical-Care Nurses) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AACN (American Association of Critical-Care Nurses) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

AACN (American Association of Critical-Care Nurses)

Hapvida NotreDame Intermédica
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
The GOOSE subscriber component improperly validates the UTC timestamp field in unauthenticated IEC 61850 GOOSE (EtherType 0x88B8) Layer-2 multicast messages. A specially crafted GOOSE frame containing an undersized timestamp field can trigger a heap out-of-bounds read during message processing, causing the process to crash and resulting in a denial-of-service condition.
OpenClaw Dashboard contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the administrator's browser session by injecting HTML markup into agent transcript messages processed through the sessions API. Attackers can craft a message containing inline event handler payloads such as an img tag with an onerror attribute within the 60-character rendering budget, which is stored in the session transcript and interpolated unsanitized into innerHTML on the default landing page, allowing theft of session tokens and unauthorized calls to authenticated administrative endpoints including agent instruction file modification.
MeshCentral 1.1.21 contains a cross-site WebSocket hijacking protection bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to hijack authenticated administrator sessions by exploiting an unconditional early return in the CheckWebServerOriginName() function within webserver.js when self-signed certificates are in use. Attackers can open cross-origin WebSocket connections to any of the twelve WebSocket endpoints, send crafted action commands to exfiltrate the server sessionKey used to sign session cookies, forge session tokens as arbitrary users, and gain full remote control of all managed devices governed by the MeshCentral instance.
The GOOSE parser contains an off-by-one boundary-handling flaw that can be triggered by a single unauthenticated Layer-2 multicast frame on the process bus. When specific GOOSE message fields are processed, the parser advances its internal buffer position incorrectly, resulting in a heap out-of-bounds read. On affected platforms, this condition reliably terminates the subscriber process and causes a denial-of-service.
The GOOSE payload parser contains a boundary handling flaw that can be triggered by a single unauthenticated Layer 2 multicast frame on the process bus. When processing specific payload fields, an attacker controlled inner element length may exceed its enclosing length, causing the parser to over read by one byte. This out-of-bounds read reliably terminates the subscriber process, resulting in a denial-of-service condition.