Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

A1 Telekom Austria GroupA1 Telekom Austria Group
VS
Proximus GroupProximus Group
A1 Telekom Austria Group

A1 Telekom Austria Group

Lassallestrasse 9, Vienna, Vienna, AT, 1020

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.a1.group/
765/1000Fair

WE ARE EMPOWERING DIGITAL LIFE We don't know what the world will look like in 2050, but we know that A1 Telekom Austria Group is geared up for current and future demands. We are a leading provider of digital services and communications solutions in Central and Eastern...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:12,126
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Proximus Group

Proximus Group

Boulevard du Roi Albert II 27, Brussels, 1030, BE

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.proximus.com
764/1000Fair

Proximus Group is a provider of future-proof connectivity, IT and digital services, headquartered in Brussels. The Group is actively engaged in building a connected world that people trust, so society blooms. The Domestic segment is focused on providing state-of-the ar...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:13,195
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
A1 Telekom Austria Group

A1 Telekom Austria Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Proximus Group

Proximus Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A1 Telekom Austria Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Proximus Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - A1 Telekom Austria Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A1 Telekom Austria Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Proximus Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Proximus Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
A1 Telekom Austria Group

A1 Telekom Austria Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
A1T2156311222
Proximus Group

Proximus Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
PRO5832158110525

FAQ

Between A1 Telekom Austria Group company and Proximus Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between A1 Telekom Austria Group company and Proximus Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between A1 Telekom Austria Group company and Proximus Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between A1 Telekom Austria Group company and Proximus Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between A1 Telekom Austria Group company and Proximus Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between A1 Telekom Austria Group company and Proximus Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between A1 Telekom Austria Group company and Proximus Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between A1 Telekom Austria Group company and Proximus Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between A1 Telekom Austria Group company and Proximus Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between A1 Telekom Austria Group company and Proximus Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between A1 Telekom Austria Group company and Proximus Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between A1 Telekom Austria Group and Proximus Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between A1 Telekom Austria Group and Proximus Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - A1 Telekom Austria Group or Proximus Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - A1 Telekom Austria Group or Proximus Group ?
Between A1 Telekom Austria Group and Proximus Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between A1 Telekom Austria Group and Proximus Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9